Dublin Grants the Most Homes and Builds the Fewest
Only 31% of Dublin's permitted large schemes start construction, vs 68% in Cork. The bottleneck is not getting permission — it is what happens after.
In Dublin City and Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown, only 31% of units in large residential schemes granted between 2018 and 2023 have a linked commencement notice (the formal record that construction has actually started). Cork converts 68% of its permitted units. Galway manages 66%. Kildare, 58%. Dublin, where demand is strongest and prices are highest, converts the least.
How many Dublin permissions actually get built?
A planning permission is not a home. There is a gap between getting the permission and breaking ground, and in Dublin that gap is wider than anywhere else in the country.
The gap shows up at every scheme size, but it is widest for medium developments of 10 to 49 units, where Dublin trails the national rate by 24 percentage points. These are the schemes that sit in the hardest middle: too small to attract institutional funding, too large to rely on small-builder economics.
| Dublin Metro | Rest of Ireland | |
|---|---|---|
| One-off (1 unit) | 49.4 | 62.4 |
| Small (2-9) | 32.1 | 50.5 |
| Medium (10-49) | 33.3 | 57.5 |
| Large (50+) | 42.9 | 60.7 |
The absolute conversion rates understate true commencement, because the building-control-to-planning linkage is incomplete. But the same method applies to every council. The gap between Dublin and elsewhere is real, even if the exact percentages are conservative.
What's striking is how localised it is. DLR converts just 25% of large scheme units, the lowest rate of any council in the dataset. DCC is at 32%. But Fingal, right next door, converts at 58%, close to the national average. This is not a Dublin-wide issue. It is concentrated in the urban core, where land costs the most and where apartment-led schemes dominate.
Is the conversion rate getting worse?
The conversion rate is not just low. It is falling.
| Dublin Metro | Rest of Ireland | |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 45.8 | 62 |
| 2019 | 40.2 | 58.5 |
| 2020 | 35.1 | 55 |
| 2021 | 30.5 | 52.8 |
| 2022 | 19.2 | 48 |
| 2023 | 31 | 45.5 |
The 2018 and 2019 cohorts have had five to six years to commence. Any further improvement from here is likely to be limited. DCC went from 45% to 18%. DLR hit 8.3% in 2022. At that point, this looks less like delayed construction than permissions the market, as it currently works, cannot turn into buildings.
Why aren't Dublin schemes viable despite high prices?
Here is where it gets confusing. If the problem were simply cost, you would expect Dublin to look like rural Ireland, where the numbers clearly do not work. But Dublin's prices are the highest in the country. The median new-build sells for €441k, 41% above the rest-of-country median.
So why is so little getting built where demand is strongest?
Because Dublin's marginal supply is increasingly apartments, not three-bedroom houses. The SCSI's all-in delivery cost for an apartment is roughly €400k. Dublin's median sale price of €441k leaves about 10% headroom. That margin has to cover developer risk, financing costs, planning delays, construction inflation, and anything else that goes wrong. For a lot of schemes, it is not enough.
The construction industry has faced significant challenges recently due to a convergence of inflation, material shortages, labour shortages, rising energy prices, and geopolitical conflicts. Inflation has driven up the costs of materials, making it difficult for companies to stay within budget and plan effectively, making it unfeasible to carry out some projects.
That is from a 24-unit scheme in Dalkey, granted in 2019, still unbuilt. Dalkey. One of the most expensive addresses in the country. The same template language turns up across multiple DLR extension applications. The word is always unfeasible.
When a developer holding a permission in Dalkey calls the project unfeasible, the gap between sale prices and delivery costs is worse than the headline medians suggest.
How many permitted units are about to expire?
Planning permissions are valid for five years. After that, they expire.
About 4,600 units in Dublin Metro, granted in 2020 and 2021, face expiry within the next 18 months with no linked commencement notice (estimated from decision date plus five years, since Dublin councils do not publish actual expiry dates). Another 12,800 units from 2018 and 2019 grants have already passed the five-year mark.
Some of these will have been extended. Some will commence late. But 17,000 permitted units approaching or past expiry without evidence of construction is hard to read as anything other than a systemic problem.
Dublin is producing permissions. It is not producing buildings. The constraint, on this evidence, is not getting the permission. It is what happens next.
What does this mean before you submit?
If you are developing a large scheme in DCC or DLR, the conversion data is blunt: fewer than one in three permitted schemes in these councils actually start construction. Your scheme needs to work at today's costs, not the costs you assumed when you applied. If you are sitting on an uncommenced permission, the clock is running.
Fingal and parts of the commuter belt look materially healthier, with conversion rates in the 52 to 58% range. But the broader trend since 2018 is downward, so the gap may widen further if viability worsens.
For anyone modelling Dublin housing supply: the headline number of "permitted units" overstates actual delivery. At current observed conversion rates, 60 to 70% of Dublin's permitted apartment pipeline may never translate into commencements. If you are using permitted units as a supply forecast, discount heavily.
The policy implication is uncomfortable. Even if permission is being granted more readily than before, this analysis suggests the dominant constraint is post-permission: construction costs, financing, and the thin margin between Dublin apartment prices and delivery costs. Planning reform alone does not close this gap, though planning delays, conditions, and design constraints may still contribute at the margins. The Viability Series documents this dynamic nationally — outside Dublin, the gap between delivery costs and sale prices is wider still.
Every figure in this article — conversion rates by council and scheme size, time series trends, expiry risk, PPR price benchmarks — can be queried for any specific council, scheme type, or geographic area. A pipeline risk assessment for a specific Dublin site takes minutes to produce.
Methodology
Conversion rate: Defined as the percentage of granted residential permissions (application_type_standard = 'permission', dev_type = 'residential') with building_control_linked = true. The NBCO match rate to planning applications is approximately 6% — all conversion rates in this article are lower bounds. However, the same matching methodology applies to all councils, so the relative gap between councils (e.g. DLR 25% vs Cork 68%) is reliable even though the absolute rates understate true commencement.
Scheme size segments: Based on num_units field (59% populated). All queries filter num_units IS NOT NULL. The analysis covers schemes where unit counts are known — schemes without unit data are excluded.
Decision window: 2018–2023, chosen to allow at least two years for commencement after a standard five-year permission. The 2022–2023 cohorts may still show future commencements (NBCO filing lag), but the 2018–2021 cohorts are mature enough for the trend to be structural.
Expiry estimates: expiry_date is NULL for Dublin councils. The 4,600-unit and 12,800-unit figures use decision_date + 5 years as a proxy. Extensions of duration would extend this window but are not tracked in DCC's published data.
PPR price comparison: 2024–2025 new-build transactions. Dublin median (€441k) covers all Dublin county sales. The SCSI apartment delivery cost benchmark (approx. €400k) is an approximate all-in figure from published SCSI reports and varies by scheme.
Document extracts: All quotes from DLR extension of duration planner reports, verified via Archa document corpus. Document IDs: 763720, 908928, 841250, 660595, 703294, 927378. All are applicant submissions within planner report documents — not the council's own assessment.
DCC data gap: Dublin City Council publishes only 'permission' and 'outline_permission' application types. Refusals, extensions of duration, and other sub-types are absent from DCC's published data. This article's conversion analysis uses only granted permissions and is therefore not affected by the refusal data gap.
Sources
Archa Planning Intelligence (primary)
Conversion rates, scheme-level analysis, time series, and expiry risk from Archa's database — planning permissions cross-referenced with NBCO building control commencement data. 31 councils for planning, 31 for NBCO. Queried 24 March 2026. Available at archa.ie.
Property Price Register
New-build sale prices by county from 775,000 PPR transactions. 2024–2025 sales. Published at propertypriceregister.ie.
Construction costs
SCSI apartment delivery cost benchmark (approx. €400k) from published SCSI reports. Three-bedroom house delivery cost floor (approx. €350k) from SCSI Tender Price Index, February 2026. All at scsi.ie.
Planning document extracts
Six DLR extension of duration planner reports containing applicant submissions. Document IDs: 763720, 908928, 841250, 660595, 703294, 927378. All verified via Archa document corpus. These are applicant-filed planning consultant reports, not council assessments.
Figures deliberately excluded
- DCC refusal data: Not published by DCC. This article analyses granted permissions only and is not affected.
- Extensions of duration for DCC: Not published. Expiry estimates use decision_date + 5 years as proxy.
- Commencement lag days: Field coverage 2.5–6.6% — too low for claims. Not used.
- Councils with fewer than 10 granted 10+ unit schemes: Excluded from council-level comparisons to avoid small-sample distortion.